That's okay. I'm new, so I don't understand all the photo speak at times and seriously didnt' know what you meant. Later it hit me.MichelB wrote: I'm not a native English speaker, but that does not excuse bad typing and not re-reading my posts...
That's okay. I'm new, so I don't understand all the photo speak at times and seriously didnt' know what you meant. Later it hit me.MichelB wrote: I'm not a native English speaker, but that does not excuse bad typing and not re-reading my posts...
kimi_boo wrote: As far as processing my images there is not much I do in CS that I could not do in Elements. The key is to really get in there and learn everything the software has to offer. This will come over time...
Get involved in the challenges and homeworks. There is no right or wrong and it allows you to get in and play with things you may not have thought of.
geoff_chalcraft wrote: I regularly look at the messages on the Photoshop Support Group on Flickr and have to laugh at so many people who ask the most basic of questions - on topics that they would also clearly have had problems with in Elements.
Why they spent that much money on "full" Photoshop is anybody's guess - probably the attitude of "well I want to sell my pictures, so that makes me a professional, so I must need professional software". I don't even think most professionals need CS2/3, unless they're heavily into graphic design and illustration. For photography, PSE has all you need. As a matter of fact, don't tell anybody, but the free "Gimp" program can also do most things a photography professional needs.
Oooo - a van marked "Adobe" has pulled up outside and four big guys in combat gear have got out.......
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests