by
genevh » Sat Sep 13, 2008 1:11 pm
Gene, if she does not fill in the dpi box to 300 and leaves it blank, will it not stay at 72dpi. I was understanding that you need to have 300dpi for print.
I did a quick check just to verify my numbers and here is what happened when I exported a photo from LR2 to CS3 at 300 ppi and then cropping it. My image in LR2 shows it is 3008x2000 pixels in dimension in the Library. Upon export to CS3, it shows it to be 300 ppi and approximately 10" x 6.6" image size. So I cropped it to 6x4 per my instructions above and ended up with a 6x4 image at approximately 372 ppi, according to the Image Size box. That was cropping it down to 2233 pixels by 1489 pixels, which was cropping out nearly 25% of the original photo. As far as I know, cropping does not do any resampling of the image, just takes the pixels you select and makes an image of that size. If I crop out about 10% of the photo, I end up with over 400 ppi. This leaves me with more than enough pixels for a good print of my image, and I still have enough pixels for a much larger print if I choose to do that. My theory here is that when I am cropping to get the best composition, I do not want to throw away any pixels if I don't have to. You can't get them back once their gone, and if you have PSE/CS resize and resample, they are making highly intelligent guesses at what is missing. Usually this works out OK within limits, but stretch those limits too much and you will start seeing a degraded image.
I also reset that same image to 72 ppi without resampling. That blew it up to an approximately 41x27 inch image (from the original 10x6 at 300ppi). If I tried printing it at that ppi, the image would look terrible, but it would be big enough to be seen from across a large room. I cropped that to a 6x4 and ended up with a 2309 pixel x 1539 pixel image that at 6x4 would still be over 384 ppi. Again, more than enough data for a good print.
And I probably should have made a distinction between cropping for composition vs cropping for printing. I know there has been a lot of talk about what is best for printing vs display, etc. As for printing the above cropped image, I have printed using both an HP photosmart 7150 (old, old, printer) and on my newer Epson Stylus Photo 1400 and both printers can handle a photo of that dimension with no problems. In other words, for my own personal printing here at home, I don't reset my ppi, just let the program and printer manage that. Some printers have size and dimension requirements so if you are dealing with one that does, you certainly will need to abide by those requirements. Is this a hard and fast rule? No. Some can print like this and get perfectly acceptable results. Others may have trouble with it. It all depends on your equipment and its requirements. That is what should dictate how you handle your printing. Just remember also, though, that PPI on the computer and DPI (dots per inch, which is how your printer sees things) are two different things.
As you can see from what I have done above, setting that box to 300 ppi would be throwing away pixels. There does come a point, though, where depending on how much you are cropping, that you can end up with less than 300 ppi. I did another crop of that same image down to 1518 pixels by 1012 pixels and ended up with 253 ppi. I could still get a decent print out of that, but I have not selected enough of the original pixels to maintain 300 ppi. That crop left me with 49% of the original picture, a pretty severe crop.
I guess the bottom line, for me anyway, is not to throw away anything I might need later, and if you are resizing for a specific requirement, save it as a new file and DO NOT overwrite your original. You may need it later with all its pixels intact!
Now that I've confused the matter even more......